Examples of using Framework decisions in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
The system is based on 3'framework decisions'.
Link between Framework Decisions and the European arrest warrant.
The Directive aims to amend and expand the existing provisions of Framework Decisions 2001/500/JHA and 2005/212/JHA.
Framework decisions are used to align the laws and regulations of the Member States.
This report therefore focuses onselected Articles that form the core part of the Framework Decisions in the light of their aims.
Framework Decisions adopted on the basis of Title VI of the EU Treaty routinely provide for at least one Commission report.
It is in this spirit that the EU adopted in 2008 and2009 three complementary Framework Decisions whose respective transposition deadlines have expired.
Solutions provided by these Framework Decisions are not satisfactory as regards cases where the person could not be informed of the proceedings.
Since part of these areas belonged earlier to the former third pillar,the Commission has to apply both directives and framework decisions in this field.
Offences covered by the Framework Decisions concerned are generally regarded as sufficiently serious to justify specific measures.
The Commission urges all those Member States that have not yet doneso to take swift measures to implement these Framework Decisions to the fullest extent.
The Framework Decisions establish a new simplified and more effective system for the transfer of sentences to facilitate and accelerate judicial cooperation.
However, the principle of conforming interpretation is binding in relation to Framework Decisions adopted in the context of Title VI of the former Treaty on European Union8.
Framework Decisions do not have direct effect however, and the Commission cannot take legal action before the Court of Justice to enforce the transposition of a Framework Decision. .
At the time of writing, respectively 10, 14 and16 Member States have not yet transposed the Framework Decisions more than 2 years and 1 year after the implementation date.
The two proposals for Council Framework Decisions would oblige EU countries to act on the three fronts of prosecuting criminals, protecting victims and preventing the offences.
Some Member States havenot implemented all grounds for refusal as indicated in the Framework Decisions(HU, LU, NL, DK, LV) others have added additional grounds(AT, BE, DK).
(6) The Commission's implementation reports on Framework Decisions 2003/577/JHA and 2006/783/JHA show that the existing regime for the mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders is not fully effective.
The Commission maynot initiate infringement proceedings based on these framework decisions for a period of five years starting from the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty14.
As the Framework Decisions are based on mutual trust in other Member States' legal systems, the decision of the judge in the issuing State should be respected and, in principle, there should be no revision or adaptation of this decision. .
The Commission's Communication provides one of the most positive framework decisions proposed thus far by the international community to help the poorer countries tackle the crisis.
The non-implementation of the Framework Decisions by some Member States is very problematic since thoseMember States who have properly implemented the Framework Decisions cannot benefit from their co-operation provisions in their relations with those Member States who did not implement them in time.
For the Member States bound by this Directive,references to Joint Action 98/699/JHA and to the provisions of Framework Decisions 2001/500/JHA and 2005/212/JHA referred to in paragraph 1 shall be construed as references to this Directive.
The efforts of the Member States that implemented the Framework Decisions in time should be underlined and the comments relating to those Member States should be understood in the light of the approach of the Commission to provide assistance in the implementation process.
Freezing certificates and confiscation certificates transmitted before 19 December2020 shall continue to be governed by Framework Decisions 2003/577/JHA and 2006/783/JHA, between the Member States bound by this Regulation until the final execution of the freezing order or confiscation order.
The report examines the implementation of three separate EU Framework Decisions covering(1) the transfer of prisoners,(2) probation and alternative sanctions,(3) and the European Supervision Order.
There are in fact operational links between the three Framework Decisions, but also between these Framework Decisions and the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant.
I support both reports because I believe we need both framework decisions and because a reasonable balance has been struck between measures to ensure security and freedom of the individual.
There are in fact operational links between the three Framework Decisions, but also between the Framework Decisions and the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant6.
Date of application of this Regulation shall continue to be governed by Framework Decisions 2003/577/JHA and 2006/783/JHA, between the Member States bound by this Regulation until the final execution of the freezing order or confiscation order.