Examples of using Framework decisions in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
Framework Decisions do not entail direct effect.
Moreover, Member States have little practical experience in the application of the Framework Decisions so far.
However, framework decisions do not have direct effect.
This does not, of course,make Member States' obligation to transpose the Framework Decisions any less binding.
Framework decisions do not have direct effect however.
The proposal, which replaces Joint Action 98/699/JHA and, in part, Framework Decisions 2001/500/JHA1 and 2005/212/JHA2.
Link between Framework Decisions and the European arrest warrant.
This is also due to the fact that many Member States have not yet complied with their obligation to transpose the Framework Decisions.
Framework decisions can best be compared with the legal instrument of a directive2.
This report therefore focuses on selected Articles that form the core part of the Framework Decisions in the light of their aims.
Framework Decisions according to Article 34, paragraph(2), point b of the Treaty on European Union.
Implementing additional grounds for refusal andmaking them mandatory seem to be both contrary to the letter and spirit of the Framework Decisions.
The framework decisions and decisions referred to in Article 34(2) of the Treaty on European Union;
It is in this spirit that the EU adopted in 2008 and 2009 three complementary Framework Decisions whose respective transposition deadlines have expired.
Framework Decisions adopted on the basis of Title VI of the EU Treaty routinely provide for at least one Commission report.
Common positions on the other hand, just like Framework Decisions, also provide for a report on national implementation7.
Framework Decisions have to be implemented by Member States as is the case with any other element of the EU acquis.
This exercise concerns first of all the legislative instruments that require transposal by the Member States- Directives and Framework Decisions.
The Framework Decisions establish a new simplified and more effective system for the transfer of sentences to facilitate and accelerate judicial cooperation.
Since part of these areas belonged earlier to the former third pillar,the Commission has to apply both directives and framework decisions in this field.
Framework decisions are binding upon the Member States as to the result to be achieved, but leave to national authorities the choice of form and methods.
Specific legislative instruments(Common Positions, Framework Decisions, Decisions and Conventions) that complicate further its implementation;
Framework decisions are binding upon the Member States as to the result to be achieved but shall leave to the national authorities the choice of form and methods.
This exercise concerns first of all the legislative instruments that require transposition by the Member States- Directives and Framework Decisions.
Council Framework Decisions are binding upon the Member States as to the result to be achieved but leave to the national authorities the choice of form and methods.
Some Member States have not implemented all grounds for refusal as indicated in the Framework Decisions(HU, LU, NL, DK, LV) others have added additional grounds AT, BE, DK.
Furthermore, it invites those that have transposed it incorrectly to review andalign their national implementation legislation with the provisions of the Framework Decisions.
However, the principle of conforming interpretation is binding in relation to Framework Decisions adopted in the context of Title VI of the former Treaty on European Union8.
Framework Decisions do not have direct effect however, and the Commission cannot take legal action before the Court of Justice to enforce the transposition of a Framework Decision. .
The Commission urges all those Member States that have not yet done so to take swift measures to implement these Framework Decisions to the fullest extent.