Examples of using Progress programme in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Proposal for a Decision on the Progress Programme 2013-2020.
The Progress programme is more than an important instrument of social policy.
This is the main reason behind our abstention on this report adopting the Progress programme.
A public online consultation on a successor instrument to the Progress programme was carried out between 4 April and 27 May 2011.
As you know, the micro-financing proposal forms part of a package which includes aproposal to transfer EUR 100 million from the Progress programme.
At the end of 2006, when we adopted the Progress programme here in this chamber, the Member States set their respective aims and began work.
The Commission proposed that no extra funds would be made available,with funding instead being taken from the Progress programme.
The transfer of funds from the Progress programme is support by the Council and, for many of the Member States, it constitutes a fundamental element of the whole package.
In the present economic and financial situation,which is characterised by a reduced supply of loans, the Progress programme extends the range of directed financial aid for new businesspeople.
For 2007-2013, the Progress programme wants to absorb the Community programmes on social protection, working conditions and so on into a single text.
Parliament's 2010 draft budget found resources of EUR 25 million, which will enable it to launch the programme at the very start of 2010,and it was able to find these resources without touching the Progress programme in 2010.
PL Madam President, the Progress programme is an important initiative intended to help Member States effectively implement objectives in the areas of employment and social affairs.
Under the terms of the 2006 Inter-institutional agreement,the EP added an additional EUR 114 million8 to the budget for the Progress programme thus increasing the budget from EUR 628 800 000 in the Commission's initial proposal to EUR 743 250 000.
The Progress programme was started to assist in realisation of European Union objectives in the fields of employment, social affairs and equal opportunities, which are laid out in the Social Agenda.
The Council andCommission originally proposed that EUR 100 million should come from the Progress programme, which is primarily used to draw up policies for combating social exclusion and supporting equal opportunities.
The Progress programme is aimed at the most exposed groups, and in relation to this, I think Member States and the European Union are responsible for effective implementation of the programme. .
The network of localauthorities' observatories which will be financed by the Progress programme will also provide analysis of the development and implementation of active inclusion strategies at the local level and promote mutual learning.
We had a project to benefit support networks for the most vulnerable- the Progress project- to which the European Parliament was highly committed, and, in order to fund microfinance, the Commission is proposing to us that weshould simply tap into the funds allocated to the Progress programme.
I made it very clear: this campaign is not in line with the Progress programme and it is not in line with the project proposal submitted to the Commission services by the Hungarian authorities.
Progress programme- Expenditure on administra-tive management 2 847 000 2 847 000 74 022 74 022 04 03 04 EURES(European Employment Services) 19 500 000 16 500 000 507 000 429 000 04 03 05 Free movement of workers, coordination of social security systems and measures for migrants, including migrants from third countries(2) 6 270 000 5 500 000 p.m. p.m.
In view of the high rate of unemployment, an ever increasing degree of social exclusion, huge integration problems and a Progress programme that is functioning exceptionally well,why is the Council persisting in demanding cuts in the Progress programme?
We must maintain the Progress programme, which targets the most vulnerable groups, and it is the joint responsibility of the Member States and the European Union to implement it effectively in the current circumstances.
There is another EUR 75 million which I think needs to be found from the budget because,if we take the money from the Progress programme, then it is very simply as if we were taking from the less poor and vulnerable in order to give it to the more poor and vulnerable.
A Europe-wide platform for mutual-learning processes to enhance the evidence base for reform design and implementation and promoting stakeholder involvement in policy-making to strengthen ownership of EU employment, social policy and inclusion objectives,building on the successful experience with the Progress Programme;
LT I would like to answer that the best solutionwould be for us to find additional funds, because the Progress programme is essentially targeted at the same groups and this would mean that, if there is no additional funding, the effect will certainly not be achieved.
That is why, taking a responsible attitude, we say that we are prepared to examine our proposal with the Spanish Presidency at the very beginning of January: EUR 40 million taken from the budgetary margins,EUR 60 million taken from the Progress programme, with EUR 20 million redeployed, enabling the burden to be distributed fairly.
I must say toElisabeth Schroeder that the fact that we are defending the Progress programme here conveys our conviction- which is a shared conviction that we are still willing to come to a compromise on this- that this programme must be implemented as soon as possible.
We need to emphasise that the reference to full andequal access for disabled persons to all activities funded under the Progress programme helps to achieve the basic objectives of the programme, in other words combating discrimination and social integration.
I would also like to ask those of my fellow Members who supported this toagree for us not to take the entire resources from the Progress programme and to lobby their own governments as well for resources, given that these countries' governments are the members of the Commission.
The new generation of employment policies,along with the initiatives of the European Social Fund and the Progress programme, should include specific criteria and indicators for improving immigrants' access to socio-occupational pathways to integration, including self-employment.