What is the translation of " LAST INSTANCE " in Slovenian?

• zadnji stopnji
• zadnje stopnje
• zadnji instanci

Examples of using Last instance in English and their translations into Slovenian

The best option- to make furniture in the room, the repair of which is scheduled in the last instance;
Najboljša možnost- da bi pohištvo v sobi, popravilo, ki je predviden v zadnji instanci;

This is the last instance of colonialism in Africa, and the international community cannot continue to remain silent.
To je zadnji primer kolonializma v Afriki, mednarodna skupnost pa ne more še naprej molčati.

WARNING- duplicate<groupid><srvid> are not allowed anymore- only the last instance will be used!
OPOZORILO- dvojnik <ID skupine><srvid> ne smejo več- uporabimo samo zadnji primerek!

Acting as second and last instance for appeals of third parties to ECB Decisions adopted by the Executive Board;
Deluje kot organ druge in zadnje stopnje za pritožbe tretjih oseb na odločbe ECB, ki jih sprejme Izvr š ilni odbor;

However, it is not clear from the documents submitted to the Court whether or not, in the main proceedings, the Okresný súd Prešov(District Court, Prešov) is ruling at last instance.
Vendar iz spisa, predloženega Sodišču, ni jasno, ali Okresný súd Prešov(okrajno sodišče v Prešovu) odloča na zadnji stopnji ali ne.

Last instance courts(those whose judgments cannot be appealed) are obliged to refersuch questions to the ECJ.
Sodišča zadnje stopnje(na sodbe katerih se ni mogoče pritožiti) so dolžna takšna vprašanja nasloviti na Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti.

Appeal in cassation is only possible against judgments delivered at last instance, that is to say, decisions against which it is no longer possible to lodge an ordinary appeal.
Vložiti jo je mogoče le zoper sodbe, izdane na zadnji stopnji,tj. odločitve, proti katerim ni več mogoče vložiti pritožbe.

In the present case, it is apparent from the questions referred for a preliminary ruling that the main proceedings concern a situation in which the national court is not called upon to rule at last instance.
V obravnavanem primeru je iz vprašanj za predhodno odločanje razvidno, da se postopek v glavni stvari nanaša na položaj, v katerem predložitveno sodišče ni pristojno za odločanje na zadnji stopnji.

That remark is even more apposite in the case of courts adjudicating at last instance, which are responsible, at national level, for ensuring that rules of law are given a uniform interpretation.
Ta ugotovitev velja še toliko bolj za sodišča, ki odločajo na zadnji stopnji in ki so, v nacionalnem sistemu, zadolžena za enotno razlago pravnih pravil.

It concluded that the right to an effective remedy, enshrined in Article 47 of the Charter, requires that an appeal against a visa refusal, annulment or revocation, includes access to a judicial body, as only or last instance of appeal.
Ugotovila je, da pravica do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva iz člena 47 Listine zahteva, da pritožba proti zavrnitvi, razveljavitvi ali preklicu vizuma vključuje dostop do pravosodnega organa kot edine ali zadnje stopnje za pritožbo.

Even if the Østre Landsret were not ruling at last instance, Article 6(1) of the Parallel Agreement would not preclude its capacity to refer, as follows from the background to the provision and the wording and aim of that agreement.
Celo če Østre Landsret ne bi odločalo na zadnji stopnji, člen 6(1) Vzporednega sporazuma ne bi nasprotoval njegovi upravičenosti do predložitve, kot izhaja iz ozadja določbe ter besedila in cilja Sporazuma.

By that request, the national court was invited to state whether, and if so in what circumstances, it was called upon to adjudicate at last instance in the enforcement proceedings at issue in the main proceedings.
Predložitveno sodišče je bilo s to zahtevo pozvano k pojasnilu, ali in pod katerimi pogoji je moralo odločati na zadnji stopnji v okviru izvršilnega postopka, obravnavanega v sporu o glavni stvari.

The first aspect concerns the question whether, in situations such as that in this case, the Member State may incur non-contractual liability for an infringement of EU law because of an act or omission of a national court which, it appears, does not have to adjudicate at last instance.
Prvi vidik zadeva vprašanje, ali je v položaju, kakršen je obravnavani, mogoče uveljavljati nepogodbeno odgovornost države članice za kršitev prava Unije zaradi ravnanja ali opustitve nacionalnega sodišča, za katero se zdi izključeno, da je moralo odločati na zadnji stopnji.

If the national court must be regarded, in connection with the main proceedings, as a court adjudicating at last instance, the question would then arise of the extent to which it has committed a sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.
Če bi bilo treba predložitveno sodišče v okviru postopka v glavni stvari obravnavati kot sodišče, ki odloča na zadnji stopnji, bi se postavilo še vprašanje, v kolikšni meri je navedeno sodišče dovolj resno kršilo pravno pravilo, katerega namen je priznavanje pravic posameznikom.

Therefore, the Constitution leaves the first supervision over elections to the National Assembly, and against the decision thereof allows an appeal before the Constitutional Court, which thereby becomes the election judge at the first and last instance(the third paragraph of Article 82 of the Constitution).
Zato Ustava prvi nadzor nad volitvami prepušča Državnemu zboru, zoper njegovo odločitev pa dovoljuje pritožbo na Ustavno sodišče, ki takó postane volilni sodnik na prvi in zadnji stopnji(tretji odstavek 82. člena Ustave).

If it is a constant law that, for example, the cost of production in the last instance- or rather when demand and supply are in equilibrium which occurs sporadically, fortuitously- determines the price(value), it is just as much a constant law that they are not in equilibrium, and that therefore value and cost of production stand in no necessary relationship.
Če je trajen zakon, da npr. produkcijski stroški v zadnji instanci- ali še več, pri sporadično, naključno nastopajočem pokrivanju povpraševanja in ponudbe- določajo ceno(vrednost), je prav tako trajen zakon, da se to razmerje ne pokriva, da torej vrednost in produkcijski stroški niso v kakem nujnem odnosu.

In light of the request of the applicant for a review of the constitutionality of the RPIA, the Constitutional Court only carried out a review insofar as it refers to a referendum dispute before the Supreme Court, which is competent to decide on a referendum dispute as a regular court of the first and last instance.
Glede na zahtevo predlagatelja za oceno ustavnosti ZRLI je Ustavno sodišče presojo opravilo le, kolikor se nanaša na referendumski spor pred Vrhovnim sodiščem, ki je pristojno kot redno sodišče prve in zadnje stopnje odločati v referendumskem sporu.

Were State liability to be wholly excluded by reason of the assessments of facts carried out by a court, those individuals would have no judicial protection if a national court adjudicating at last instance committed a manifest error in its review of the above operations of legal classification of facts.
Če pa bi bila- zaradi presoje sodišča glede dejstev- odgovornost države popolnoma izključena, ne bi ti posamezniki imeli na voljo nobenega sodnega varstva, če bi nacionalno sodišče, ki odloča na zadnji stopnji, naredilo očitno napako pri nadzoru zgoraj navedenih pravnih kvalifikacij dejstev.

If that is the case, a decision by that national court adjudicating at last instance may constitute a sufficiently serious breach of EU law, capable of giving rise to that liability, only where, by that decision, that court manifestly infringed the applicable law or where that infringement takes place despite the existence of well-established Court case-law on the matter.
Če je tako, odločba nacionalnega sodišča, ki odloča na zadnji stopnji, pomeni dovolj resno kršitev prava Unije, na podlagi katere je mogoče uveljavljati navedeno odgovornost, le če je navedeno sodišče s to odločbo očitno kršilo pravo, ki se uporablja, ali če do te kršitve pride kljub temu, da na tem področju obstaja ustaljena sodna praksa Sodišča.

On the other hand, such an omission may be classified as a sufficiently serious infringement when, in spite of the information brought to its attention, either by the consumer himself or by other means, the court called upon to adjudicate at last instance has failed to raise of its own motion the unfairness of a contractual term contained in such a contract.
Nasprotno pa je mogoče tako opustitev opredeliti za dovolj resno kršitev, če sodišče, ki je moralo odločati na zadnji stopnji, kljub informacijam, s katerimi je bilo seznanjeno prek potrošnika ali z drugimi sredstvi, ni po uradni dolžnosti preizkusilo nepoštenosti pogodbenega pogoja iz take pogodbe.

(2) In order for failure by the court adjudicating at last instance in enforcement proceedings to assess the unfairness of a contractual term under Directive 93/13 to be classified as a sufficiently serious infringement such as to give rise to State liability, account must be taken of all the factual and legal elements brought to its attention by the date on which it gives its ruling.
Da sodišče, ki odloča na zadnji stopnji v okviru postopka izvršbe, ni presojalo nepoštenosti pogodbenega pogoja na podlagi Direktive 93/13, opredeliti kot dovolj resno kršitev, na podlagi katere je mogoče uveljavljati odgovornost države, je treba upoštevati vse dejanske in pravne elemente, s katerimi je bilo seznanjeno na datum odločanja.

Operative part of the judgment 1. Member State liability for damage caused to individuals as a result of a breach of EU law by a decision of a national court may be incurred only where that decision is made by a court of that Member State adjudicating at last instance, which it is for the referring court to determine in respect of the main proceedings.
Izrek Odgovornost države članice za škodo, povzročeno posameznikom s kršitvijo prava Unije, storjeno z odločbo nacionalnega sodišča, je mogoče uveljavljati, samo če je to odločbo izdalo sodišče te države članice, ki odloča na zadnji stopnji, kar mora glede spora o glavni stvari preveriti predložitveno sodišče.

With the judgment in question, the Court of Justice clearly takes the position that the infringement of the obligations under Article 267(3) TFEU by the court deciding at last instance actually constitutes the failure to fulfil obligations by the Member State in which the national court has acted this way, for which liability of the Member State may be established under the procedure from Article 258 TFEU.
Z aktualno sodbo Sodišče EU jasno zavzame stališče, da kršitev obveznosti po členu 267(3) PDEU sodišča, ki odloča na zadnji stopnji, dejansko pomeni neizpolnitev obveznosti države članice, v kateri je nacionalno sodišče tako ravnalo, za katero se lahko ugotavlja odgovornost države članice po postopku iz člena 258 PDEU.

In that regard, the Court has held, as I also stated in point 54 of this Opinion, that the principle that the Member States are liable to afford reparation of damage caused to individuals as a result of infringements of Community law for which they are responsible is also applicable when the alleged infringement stems from a decision of a court adjudicating at last instance.
V zvezi s tem je Sodišče razsodilo, kot je bilo opozorjeno v točki 54 teh sklepnih predlogov, da se lahko načelo, po katerem so države članice dolžne povrniti škodo, ki je bila posameznikom povzročena s kršitvami prava Unije, za katere so odgovorne, enako uporabi tudi takrat, kadar zadevna kršitev izhaja iz odločbe sodišča, ki odloča na zadnji stopnji.

Accordingly, if it is possible, under the applicable national law, for the liability of courts not adjudicating at last instance to be incurred for infringement of the applicable national rules of law, that possibility should also be open in the same circumstances for the situation in which the national court has infringed the rights of individuals under EU law, and, in particular, those deriving from Directive 93/13.
Če je torej mogoče na podlagi veljavnega nacionalnega prava zaradi kršitve veljavnih nacionalnih pravnih pravil uveljavljati odgovornost sodišč, ki ne odločajo na zadnji stopnji, bi morala biti ta možnost pod enakimi pogoji odprta tudi, če je nacionalno sodišče kršilo pravice, ki jih imajo posamezniki na podlagi prava Unije, zlasti tiste, ki izhajajo iz Direktive 93/13.

Analogous considerations linked to the need to guarantee effective judicial protection to individuals of the rights conferred on them by Community law similarly preclude State liability not being incurred solely because an infringement of Community law attributable to a national court adjudicating at last instance arises from the interpretation of provisions of law made by that court.
Podobni preudarki, povezani z nujnostjo posameznikom zagotavljati učinkovito sodno varstvo pravic, ki jim jih daje pravo Skupnosti, prav tako nasprotujejo temu, da odgovornost države ne bi nastala samo zato, ker kršitev prava Skupnosti, ki jo zakrivi nacionalno sodišče, ki odloča na zadnji stopnji, izhaja iz razlage pravnih pravil, ki jo opravi to sodišče.

Thus far it has only occurred once that in constitutional complaint proceedings the Constitutional Court alone decided as the court of first and last instance(in my opinion, that was in fact unconstitutional, because the Constitutional Court had the possibility to first establish judicial protection), without such power being conferred thereon by the Constitution or a law(or the manner of execution of a decision of the Constitutional Court, which has the force of a law).
Le enkrat je doslej Ustavno sodišče(po mojem mnenju sicer protiustavno, ker je imelo vse možnosti najprej vzpostaviti sodno varstvo) v postopku z ustavno pritožbo sámo odločalo kot sodišče prve in zadnje stopnje, ne da bi mu Ustava ali zakon(ali način izvršitve odločbe Ustavnega sodišča, ki ima moč zakona!) to pristojnost dala.

In addition, the uncertainties thus surrounding the disputed national provisions are also liable to have an effect on the working of the system of judicial cooperation embodied by the preliminary ruling mechanism provided for in Article 267 TFEU, the keystone of the EU judicial system, for which the independence of the national courts, and particularly those ruling at last instance, is essential.
Poleg tega lahko negotovost, ki tako obdaja sporne nacionalne določbe, vpliva na delovanje sistema pravosodnega sodelovanja, ki ga predstavlja sistem predhodnega odločanja iz člena 267 PDEU, ki je bistvo sodnega sistema Evropske unije, v katerem sta bistvena elementa neodvisnost nacionalnih sodišč in zlasti neodvisnost sodišč, ki odločajo na zadnji stopnji.

The right to reimbursement of the advance payment illegally made is restricted by limiting the tax credit to the amount of the dividend redistributed in France which comes from a subsidiary established outside France, and whereas the Conseil d'État, administrative court adjudicating at last instance, established those restrictions without asking the Court of Justice for the purposes of determining the compatibility of those restrictions with EU law.
Pravica do vračila nezakonito obračunanega predplačila davka je omejena z omejitvijo davčnega odbitka tretji osebi od zneska dividende, ki ga je hčerinska družba s sedežem zunaj Francije izplačala v Franciji, čeprav je Conseil d'État, upravno sodišče, ki odloča na zadnji stopnji, določilo te omejitve, ne da bi Sodišču postavilo vprašanje za ugotovitev skladnosti teh omejitev s pravom Unije.

However, that does not mean that, as a result, the Constitutional Court may assume the powers of the Supreme Court by finding that the judicial protection expressly regulated by law is ineffective, and instead of supervising the judiciary as the last court in the state on the basis of a constitutional complaint, namely whether the judiciary observes human rights and fundamental freedoms when adjudicating, it itself adjudicates as the court of first and last instance.
Vendar to še ne pomeni, da si zato lahko Ustavno sodišče vzame pristojnost Vrhovnega sodišča z ugotovitvijo, da je sodno varstvo, ki ga zakon izrecno ureja, neučinkovito, in namesto, da na podlagi ustavne pritožbe kot zadnje sodišče v državi kontrolira sodstvo, ali to pri sojenju spoštuje človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine, sámo sodi kot sodišče prve in zadnje stopnje.