Примеры использования Sanctions implementation на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
III. Sanctions implementation challenges.
Private sector in sanctions implementation.
The Monitoring Team undertook several visits to various regions to discuss sanctions implementation.
The responsibility for sanctions implementation, however, first and foremost rests with States.
The role of panels of experts in monitoring sanctions implementation.
Люди также переводят
The Group discussed sanctions implementation at length with the Government of Uganda.
Successes and difficulties in States sanctions implementation.
Sanctions implementation inside Afghanistan depends on the availability of list information in local languages.
The political context, which remains volatile,affects sanctions implementation and the Panel's work.
The sanctions implementation procedure needed to be further improved in order to increase the effectiveness and flexibility of sanctions regimes.
In the long term it is unclear what effect this changing political context will have on sanctions implementation, but in the short term the outlook is discouraging.
How can we improve information- sharing with, and effective cooperation between, these organizations and instruments andthe Council, to assist in sanctions implementation?
The Monitoring Team undertook several visits to various regions to discuss sanctions implementation with States and international organizations.
The Committee is committed to further improving its procedures with a view to addressing outstanding relevant issues that could further improve sanctions implementation.
The Panel notes the heightened awareness among Member States regarding sanctions implementation, as reflected in the number of reported alleged violations.
The sanctions committees will make their decisions available to all Member States unless they decide that such disclosure does not facilitate sanctions implementation;
The Team has attended specialist meetings on sanctions implementation, on countering the financing of terrorism and on the legal challenges facing States as a result of actions taken against listed parties.
This exercise enabled States to hear from the Committee and the Panel, ask questions, andbetter understand issues related to sanctions implementation and the work of the Committee.
Ms. Lehto shared her experience on sanctions implementation in Finland and observed that in the light of the increased sophistication and complexity of sanctions regimes, the work of sanctions committees was not sufficiently transparent.
This exercise enabled Member States to hear from the Committee and the Panel, ask questions andgain a better understanding of issues related to sanctions implementation and the work of the Committee.
The Committee should consider requesting Member States to respond to a targeted questionnaire on sanctions implementation, which could be based on the model developed by the Stockholm Process on the Implementation of Targeted Sanctions see annex III.
Members of the Committee found that this kind of dialogue and direct interaction with Member States was a useful tool for further improving andenhancing effective sanctions implementation.
The Monitoring Team has assisted the Committee in achieving progress in its work through high-quality reporting on sanctions implementation on the ground, and constantly provides valuable input to the Committee's work by outlining and analysing issues that the Committee will need to address in the future.
Although the expert groups would undoubtedly benefit from such a system, its ultimate purpose is to provide a safe andstructured archive for data on sanctions implementation called for by the Council.
Security Council sanctions committees should be mandated to develop improved guidelines andreporting procedures to assist States in sanctions implementation, and to improve procedures for maintaining accurate lists of individuals and entities subject to targeted sanctions; .
The establishment of sanctions monitoring mechanisms is an important innovation in the structure of Security Council sanctions regimes,which has contributed to more effective sanctions implementation.
The recommendation of the Monitoring Team to utilize the Committee's website for promoting the engagement of States in sanctions implementation and dialogue with the Committee was met with full support.
Such cooperation, including information exchange, is facilitated by the World Customs Organization through its global network ofregional intelligence liaison offices, although this is not used specifically for sanctions implementation.
The Team reached out numerous times to INTERPOL, attending the General Assembly andaddressing participants in the workshops on sanctions implementation hosted by INTERPOL throughout 2012 in Rome and Bratislava.
The recommendation to provide general guidelines to States on how best to conduct an effective search of the Committee's list was welcomed by the Committee,as they can allow States to enhance their sanctions implementation.